Value for Money-at-Risk Analysis Model for Green Batching Plant Benefit based National Ready Mix Co Association (NRMCA) Method
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32832/astonjadro.v14i2.17051Keywords:
readymix concrete; green; value for money; at risk analysis model; SEM-PLS.Abstract
The current green concept trend in Indonesia is contributing to the advancement of sustainability across all industries, including the construction materials sector. The concrete business is crucial because it provides the fundamental components for concrete, which is a critical role it performs in the building process. Throughout the production process, ready-mix concrete has a very negative effect on the environment. Planning and constructing a green concept will be 10-20% more expensive than conventional development. Researchers will use the value for money (VfM)-at-risk analysis model technique to cost-effectively apply the concept of the green concrete industry to statistical analysis and case studies. To improve cost performance, this research updates the knowledge on the green concept for concrete industrial objects and searches for factors that affect its application using partial least square (SEM-PLS) analysis and green concept modeling based on the value for monet at risk analysis model. "10 factors that influence the performance of green costs in the concrete industry" were identified by the research, and they include the following: the risk analysis model, the planning stage, internal costs, production, value for money, the bidding stage, the implementation stage, product use, the operation stage, and maintenance. The application of the VfM-at-risk analysis model was able to increase the green cost performance by 8.66% with a return of 9 years and 2 months by gaining benefits as an environmentally friendly and sustainable concrete industry.
References
Emisi karbon dioksida. 1(November), 0–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2020.100004
Berawi, B. (2015). (Received: August 2014 / Revised: January 2015 / Accepted: January 2015). 2010–2014.
Berawi, M. A., Nabila, A., Gunawan, Miraj, P., Rahman, H. A., & Berawi, A. R.
B. (2018). Analysis of life cycle cost and public-private partnership in the development of Walini City as technology park. International Journal of Technology, 9(7), 1469–1479. https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v9i7.2588
Christiani, A., Kristina, H. J., & Rahayu, P. C. (2017). Pengukuran Kinerja Lingkungan Industri di Indonesia berdasarkan Standar Industri Hijau. Jurnal RekayasaSistemIndustri, 6(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.26593/jrsi.v6i1.2426.39-
Chumaidi, M. (2017). Implementasi Value Based Decision pada Pemilihan Metode Kerja Ereksi Girder pada Pekerjaan Jembatan Kali Marmoyo BerdasarkanKriteria Finansial dan Non ….
https://repository.its.ac.id/47257/
Chunzhi, Z., Yi, L., Shiwei, R., & Jiang, Q. (2018). Testing and green assessmenttechnology for ready-mixed concrete. Key Engineering Materials, 768 KEM,306–313.
https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.768.306Dan, P., & Infrastruktur, P. (2017). Diklat perkerasan kaku |2017.
Ebrahim, A., & Wayal, A. S. (2020). ICRRM 2019 – System Reliability, Quality Control, Safety, Maintenance and Management. In ICRRM 2019 – System Reliability, Quality Control, Safety, Maintenance and Management. Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8507-0
Ekanayake, B. J., Sandanayake, Y., & Ramachandra, T. (2018). Application of value management to refurbishment projects: A Sri Lankan case study. Proceeding of the 34th Annual ARCOM Conference, ARCOM 2018, September, 597–606.
Erma, S. (2006). Pemodelan dan Simulasi. Pemodelan Dan Simulasi.
Ervianto, W. I. (n.d.). Identifikasi Indikator Green Construction Pada Proyek Konstruksi Bangunan Gedung di Indonesia.
Hair Jr, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., & Ray, S. (2021). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) using R: A workbook. In Springer.
He, Q., Zhao, H., Shen, L., Dong, L., Cheng, Y., & Xu, K. (2019). Factors influencing residents’ intention toward green retrofitting of existing residential buildings. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(15), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11154246
Heijungs, R., Hellweg, S., Koehler, A., Pennington, D., & Suh, S. (2009). Recent developments in Life Cycle Assessment. Journal of Environmental Management, 91(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.06.018
Hidayah, S., & Husin, A. E. (2022). Faktor-Faktor yang Paling Berpengaruh pada Pekerjaan Retrofitting Rumah Sakit Berbasis Peraturan yang Berlaku di Indonesia. 20, 323–332.
Husin, A. E. (2015). Model Aliansi Strategis Dalam Kemitraan Pemerintah dan Swasta Pada Mega Proyek Infrastruktur Berbasis Value Engineering Untuk Meningkatkan Nilai Kelayakan Proyek. 1–337.
Husin, A. E. (2019). Implementation Value Engineering In Diaphragm Wall at High Rise Building. 8(1), 16–23.
Hwang, B.-G., Zhu, L., Wang, Y., & Cheong, X. (2017). Green Building Construction Projects in Singapore. Project Management Journal, 48(4), 67– 79.https://www.pmi.org//media/pmi/documents/public/pdf/learning/pmj/earl y-edition/aug-sep-2017/j20170867.pdf.
Imron, A., & Husin, A. E. (2022). Value Engineering and Lifecycle Cost Analysisto Improve Cost Performance in Green Hospital Project Value engineering and lifecycle cost analysis to improve cost performance in green hospitalproject. December 2021. https://doi.org/10.24425/ace.2021.138514
Imron, A. I., & Husin, A. E. (2021). Peningkatan Kinerja Biaya Berbasis Value Engineering Pada Proyek Green Hospital. Jurnal Aplikasi Teknik Sipil, 19(3), 323. https://doi.org/10.12962/j2579-891x.v19i3.9144.
Kovacic, I., & Zoller, V. (2015). Building life cycle optimization tools for early design phases. Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2015.03.027
Mandil, M. A., & Bushnak, A. A. (2003). Future needs for desalination in South Mediterranean countries. Desalination, 152(1–3), 15–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0011-9164(02)01043-3
Manggala, H. P., & Utomo, C. (2014). Penerapan Rekayasa Nilai pada Proyek Pembangunan Rumah Tipe 39 di Perumahan Sapphire Park Regency Surabaya. Jurnal Teknik Pomits, 3(2), 137–142.
Marzuki, P. F., Abduh, M., & Driejana, R. (2013). PERAN LIFE CYCLE ANALYSIS ( LCA ) PADA MATERIAL KONSTRUKSI DALAM UPAYA MENURUNKAN DAMPAK EMISI KARBON DIOKSIDA PADA EFEK GAS 3 . KAJIAN PUSTAKA. 7(KoNTekS 7), 24–26.
Miles, L. D. (n.d.). The cost problem and t h e value engineering approach. 1–6.
Mittal, V. K., & Sangwan, K. S. (2015). Ranking of drivers for green manufacturing implementation using fuzzy technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution method. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 22(1–2), 119–130. https://doi.org/10.1002/mcda.1527
Mulyana, A. (2017). Analisis Konsumsi Energi dan Emisi Gas Rumah Kaca pada Tahap Konstruksi Studi Kasus : Konstruksi Jalan Cisumdawu. 24(3), 269– 280. https://doi.org/10.5614/jts.2017.24.3.10
Pahnael, J. R. N., Soekiman, A., & Wimala, M. (2020). Penerapan Kebijakan Insentif Green Building Di Kota Bandung. Jurnal Infrastruktur, 6(1), 1–13.
https://doi.org/10.35814/infrastruktur.v6i1.1315
Rahmawati, A., Wisnumurti, W., & Nugroho, A. M. (2018). Pengaruh Penerapan Green Retrofit Terhadap Life Cycle Cost pada Bangunan Gedung. Rekayasa Sipil, 12(1), 64–70.
https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.rekayasasipil/2018.012.01.9
Ratnaningsih, A., Hasanuddin, A., Hermansa, R., Sipil, J. T., Teknik, F., Unej, U. J., & Kalimantan, J. (2014). Penilaian Kriteria Green Building Pada Pembangunan Gedung IsDB Project Berdasarkan Skala Indeks Menggunakan Greenship Versi 1 . 2 (Studi Kasus: Gedung Engineering Biotechnology Universitas Jember) (Assessment Green Building Criteria for The Constructi. 2.
Ren, M., Mitchell, C. R., & Mo, W. (2020). Dynamic life cycle economic and environmental assessment of residential solar photovoltaic systems.
Science of the Total Environment,722,137932.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020. 137932.
Ronald, J., Pahnael, N., Soekiman, A., Parahyangan, U. K., Wimala, M., & Parahyangan, U. K. (2020). Penerapan kebijakan insentif green building di kota bandung. May. https://doi.org/10.35814/infrastruktur.v6i1.1315
Sekaran, U. (2011). Research Methods for Business (Metodologi Penelitian Untuk Bisnis). In Metode Penelitian. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004 Shabrin, N.; & Kashem, S. B. A. (2017). A comprehensive cost benefit analysisof green building. Proceedings of 94th The IIER International Conference, February, 6–15.
Sigrist, D., Deb, C., Frei, M., & Schlüter, A. (2019). Cost-optimal retrofit analysis for residential buildings. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1343(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1343/1/012030
Studi, P., Industri, T., Dirgantara, U., & Suryadarma, M. (n.d.). BIAYA PENERANGAN PADA HIGH RISE BUILDING DENGAN METODE LIFE CYCLE COST ANALYSIS (LCCA).
Study, C., Correia, N., Samani, P., & Gregory, J. (2018). Lifecycle Cost Analysis of Prefabricated Composite and Masonry Buildings: Comparative Study. 24(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000288.
Sugiyono. (2008). Metode Penelitian Kuatintatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. In Alfabeta. https://doi.org/2008
Sun, C. Y., Chen, Y. G., Wang, R. J., Lo, S. C., Yau, J. T., & Wu, Y. W. (2019). Construction cost of green building certified residence: A case study inTaiwan. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(8), 21–25. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11082195
Suryanto, S., & R, F. A. (1978). Analisis perbandingan produktivitas produksi beton readymix metode wetmix dan drymix 1. 13(2).
Wao, J., Ries, R., Flood, I., & Kibert, C. J. (2016). Refocusing Value Engineering forSustainableConstruction.June.
https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.1323.6723Widiati, I. R. (2019). Tinjauan studi analisis komparatif bangunan hijau (green building) dengan metode asesmen sebagaiupaya mitigasi untuk pembangunan konstruksi yang berkelanjutan. Prosiding Konferensi Nasional Pascasarjana Teknik Sipil (KNPTS) X 2019, November 69 76.
https://scholar.google.co.id/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=id&user= mW42NwIAAAAJ&citation_for_view=mW42NwIAAAAJ:IjCSPb-OGe4C
Widodo, S. (2010). Pemanfaatan air limbah produksi beton. VI(1), 1–10.
Yuan, Q., Yang, D., Yang, F., Luken, R., Saieed, A., & Wang, K. (2020). Green industry development in China: An index based assessment from perspectives of both current performance and historical effort. Journal of CleanerProduction,250(November). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.11 9457
Zhao, M., Gong, X., Shi, F., & Fang, M. (2013). Life cycle assessment of ready- mixed concrete. Materials Science Forum, 743–744, 234–238. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.743-744.234
Hawkesworth, I., and P. Burger. 2011. “How to attain value for money: Comparing PPP and traditional infrastructure public procurement.” OECD J. Budgeting 11 (1): 7–57. https://doi.org/10.1787/budget-11 -5kgg8r57tf34.80
OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). 2008. Public-private partnerships: In pursuit of risk sharing and value for money. Paris: OECD.
https://www.maximizemarketresearch.com/market-report/global-ready-mix-concrete-market/73708/2024
https://kpbu.kemenkeu.go.id/read/21-18/pjpk/persyaratan-proyek/value-for-money-vfm, 2024
Thoengsal, James, 2024, KONSEP KONSTRUKSI HIJAU (GREEN CONSTRUCTION, Sulawesi.
Ervianto, Wulfram I, Pengelolaan proyek konstruksi yang “green”, Yogjakarta,
Li, Bing, Akintoye, Akintola, Hardcastle, Cliff, 2001, VFM and Risk Allocation Models in Construction PPP Projects.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 ASTONJADRO
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Paper submitted to ASTONJADRO is the sole property of the Astonjadro Journal. Unless the author withdraws the paper because he does not want to be published in this journal. The publication rights are in the journal Astonjadro.ASTONJADRO
LICENSE
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at http://ejournal.uika-bogor.ac.id/index.php/ASTONJADRO
