The Analysis of Rescheduling the Savanna Sumatera Bridge Project Using the Pert Method

Authors

  • Alfin Lambok Pascatama Panjaitan INDONESIA
  • Gina Cynthia Raphita Hasibuan INDONESIA
  • M. Ridwan Anas INDONESIA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32832/astonjadro.v14i2.17302

Keywords:

most likely duration; optimistic duration; pessimistic duration; pert method; rescheduling.

Abstract

Project schedules are generally created manually, which may lead to delays during the implementation on-site. It is due to the non-inclusion of the uncertainty factor in planning the project schedule. Delays in accomplishing one activity will result in delays in the next one. This study was intended to conduct rescheduling process to minimize the delay in the implementation of the Savanna Sumatera Bridge Project. The study applied PERT method in the rescheduling exercise by using three times conjectures on each project work item, which are: optimistic duration, most likely duration, and pessimistic duration. The results showed that the project was completed in 162 working days with a probability of completion of 99.9%, 34 days faster than the target project duration of 196 working days.

Author Biographies

Alfin Lambok Pascatama Panjaitan, INDONESIA

Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan

Gina Cynthia Raphita Hasibuan, INDONESIA

Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan

M. Ridwan Anas, INDONESIA

Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan

References

Alwie, rahayu deny danar dan alvi furwanti, Prasetio, A. B., Andespa, R., Lhokseumawe, P. N., & Pengantar, K. (2020). Tugas Akhir Tugas Akhir. In Jurnal Ekonomi Volume 18, Nomor 1 Maret201 (Vol. 2, Issue 1).

Amrullah, M. F. K., Budiarto, U., & Zakki, A. F. (2020). Penjadwalan Proyek Reparasi Kapal Tugboat Selat Legundi II – 206 Dengan Metode Time Cost Trade-Off (TCTO) dan Project Evaluation And Review Technique (PERT). Teknik Perkapalan, XX(3), 368–374.

Anfaal, M., Ghifari, A., & Djuanda, G. (2023). Optimasi Pembangunan Tangki Air Tanah dan Sanitasi Menggunakan Metode Program Evaluation and Review Technique (PERT) dan Critical Path Metode (CPM) Agar Efektif Biaya Dan Waktu. Media Online, 3(3), 687–692. https://doi.org/10.47065/arbitrase.v3i3.684

Arianto. (2005). EKSPLORASI METODE BAR CHART, CPM, PDM, PERT, LINE OF BALANCE DAN TIME CHAINAGE DIAGRAM DALAM PENJADWALAN PROYEK KONSTRUKSI Ar if Ar ia n to.

Febriana, W., & Aziz, U. A. (2021). Analisis Penjadwalan Proyek Dengan Metode PERT Menggunakan Microsoft Project 2016. Surya Beton : Jurnal Ilmu Teknik Sipil, 5(1), 37–45. http://jurnal.umpwr.ac.id/index.php/suryabeton

GOOD, G. (2015). 済無No Title No Title No Title. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 6(11), 951–952., 1(April).

Hadicara, D., Magister, P., Sipil, T., Teknik, F., Islam, U., & Agung, S. (2023). 20230327094100-2023-03-27Data_Karya_Ilmiah094057.

Kristianti, N. (2021). Penjadwalan Proyek Dengan Metode Pert Studi Kasus : Proyek Pembangunan Gedung Tilc Ugm Di Yogyakarta (Scheduling Project With Pert Method Case Study: Building Project of Tilc Ugm At Yogyakarta). 107.

Nanda, M. P., Kurniawati, M., & Riswanto, S. (2023). Penggunaan Metode Project Evaluation Review Technique (Pert) Dalam Evaluasi Perencanaan Penjadwalan Proyek. Jurnal Teknik Sipil, 17(3), 163–173. https://doi.org/10.24002/jts.v17i3.7181

Perwitasari, D., Fahreza, A., & Ririh, K. R. (2021). Analisis Percepatan Waktu Proyek Perumahan Menggunakan Metode PERT dan Fast Track. RekaRacana: Jurnal Teknil Sipil, 7(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.26760/rekaracana.v7i1.226

Pratama, Y. A. (2020). Analisis Penjadwalan Proyek dengan Metode PERT. Universitas Islam Indonesia, iv–68. https://dspace.uii.ac.id/bitstream/handle/123456789/30934/16914014 Yudha Andika Pratama.pdf?sequence=1

Puspitasari, D. P., Purwono, N. A. S., & Poerwodihardjo, F. E. (2022). ANALISIS PERBANDINGAN PENJADWALAN PROYEK DENGAN METODE CPM, PERT, KURVA-S (Studi Kasus Peningkatan Jalan Menganti Kesugihan). Teodolita: Media Komunkasi Ilmiah Di Bidang Teknik, 23(1), 77–89. https://doi.org/10.53810/jt.v23i1.441

Ra, J., & Kota, K. (2023). Jurnal Manajemen Rekayasa (Journal of Engineering Management). 26–38.

Saputra, N., Handayani, E., & Dwiretnani, A. (2021). Analisa Penjadwalan Proyek dengan Metode Critical Path Method (CPM) Studi Kasus Pembangunan Gedung Rawat Inap RSUD Abdul Manap Kota Jambi. Jurnal Talenta Sipil, 4(1), 44. https://doi.org/10.33087/talentasipil.v4i1.48

Yuwono, W., Kaukab, M. E., & Mahfud, Y. (2021). Kajian Metode PERT-CPM dan Pemanfaatannya dalam Manajemen Waktu dan Biaya Pelaksanaan Proyek. Journal of Economic, Management, Accounting and Technology, 4(2), 192–214. https://doi.org/10.32500/jematech.v4i2.1925

Published

2025-05-13

How to Cite

Panjaitan, A. L. P., Hasibuan, G. C. R., & Anas, M. R. (2025). The Analysis of Rescheduling the Savanna Sumatera Bridge Project Using the Pert Method . ASTONJADRO, 14(2), 442–452. https://doi.org/10.32832/astonjadro.v14i2.17302

Issue

Section

Articles