Field Static Loading Test on 40.8 m Span PCU Girder Bridge

Authors

  • Effendi Yusuf INDONESIA
  • Akhmad Aminullah INDONESIA
  • Inggar Septhia Irawati INDONESIA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32832/astonjadro.v14i3.18409

Keywords:

static load test; prestressed bridge; PCU Girder; deflection; on-field test.

Abstract

Field load testing using static loading is widely applied as a non-destructive testing (NDT) method for bridge assessment due to its practicality and ability to provide immediate, on-site results. This approach is suitable for both new and old bridges, requiring strength evaluation to understand the behavior and fundamental characteristics of the bridge. In this paper, 40.8 span PCU Girder Bridge was tested with a static loading test to obtain key performance and response indicators, such as the maximum deflection of the bridge under static load. The research findings showed that the bridge’s maximum deflection was -13.8 mm from the field load test, indicating the bridge structure is below the design limit of -35.7 mm, confirming its capacity to support a 192-ton load. The experimental results indicate that the bridge remains within the elastic range when subjected to the planned test loads. This suggests that the bridge has sufficient load-bearing capacity. Additionally, these findings reflect the current condition of the structure, which can serve as a foundation for ongoing structural health monitoring and future maintenance of the bridge.

Author Biographies

Effendi Yusuf, INDONESIA

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta

Akhmad Aminullah, INDONESIA

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta

Inggar Septhia Irawati, INDONESIA

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta

References

AASHTO LRFD bridge construction specification (2010) Chapter 11. (2010).

American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. (2012). AASHTO LRFD bridge design specifications, customary U.S. units. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.

Bu, Z.-Y., Ou, Y.-C., Song, J.-W., Zhang, N.-S., & Lee, G. C. (2016). Cyclic Loading Test of Unbonded and Bonded Posttensioned Precast Segmental Bridge Columns with Circular Section. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 21(2). https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)be.1943-5592.0000807

Cao, W. J., Koh, C. G., & Smith, I. F. C. (2019). Enhancing static-load-test identification of bridges using dynamic data. Engineering Structures, 186(January), 410–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.02.041

De Domenico, D., Messina, D., & Recupero, A. (2022). Quality control and safety assessment of prestressed concrete bridge decks through combined field tests and numerical simulation. Structures, 39(January), 1135–1157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2022.03.086

Gara, F., Nicoletti, V., Carbonari, S., Ragni, L., & Dall’Asta, A. (2020). Dynamic monitoring of bridges during static load tests: influence of the dynamics of trucks on the modal parameters of the bridge. Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring, 10(2), 197–217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-019-00376-1

Hernandez, E. S., & Myers, J. J. (2018). Strength evaluation of prestressed concrete bridges by dynamic load testing. Maintenance, Safety, Risk, Management and Life-Cycle Performance of Bridges - Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Bridge Maintenance, Safety and Management, IABMAS 2018, August, 1450–1455. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315189390-197

Jalan, P. K. J. dan T. (2011). Pedoman Pemeriksaan Jembatan. Standar Pedoman Pemeriksaan Jembatan, 01, 1–146.

Kementrian PUPR. (2024). Informasi Statistik Infrastruktur PUPR. Pusat Data Dan Teknologi Informasi. http://scioteca.caf.com/bitstream/handle/123456789/1091/RED2017-Eng-8ene.pdf?sequence=12&isAllowed=y%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2008.06.005%0Ahttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/305320484_SISTEM_PEMBETUNGAN_TERPUSAT_STRATEGI_MELESTARI

Marefat, M. S., Ghahremani-Gargary, E., & Ataei, S. (2004). Load test of a plain concrete arch railway bridge of 20-m span. Construction and Building Materials, 18(9), 661–667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2004.04.025

Nurrochmat, C., Soelarso, S., & Darwis, Z. (2023). Static Behavior of Steel Frame Bridge (Case Study of Citanduy Bridge, Tasikmalaya Regency). Fondasi : Jurnal Teknik Sipil, 12(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.36055/fondasi.v12i1.19600

PUPR, D. B. (2015). Permen PUPR No. 41-2015. 36(June), 5860.

Ren, W.-X., Lin, Y.-Q., & Peng, X.-L. (2007). Field Load Tests and Numerical Analysis of Qingzhou Cable-Stayed Bridge. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 12(2), 261–270. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)1084-0702(2007)12:2(261)

Standar Nasional Indonesia. (2016). Pembebanan Untuk Jembatan. Badan Standarisasi Nasional.

Sun, S., Lei, G., & Sun, Z. (2019). Dynamic and static load tests on a large-span rigid-frame bridge. Mathematical Modelling of Engineering Problems, 6(3), 409–414. https://doi.org/10.18280/mmep.060312

Published

2025-09-23

How to Cite

Yusuf, E., Aminullah, A., & Irawati, I. S. (2025). Field Static Loading Test on 40.8 m Span PCU Girder Bridge . ASTONJADRO, 14(3), 903–911. https://doi.org/10.32832/astonjadro.v14i3.18409

Issue

Section

Articles