Mampukah sekolah gratis mencapai pemenuhan standar nasional pendidikan?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32832/tadibuna.v9i1.2863Keywords:
sekolah gratis, standar nasional pendidikan.Abstract
Politically, the policy of free schooling is interesting but in implementation, it raised many problems so it needs to find the real condition of this policy. This research is to find out the power of free schooling education policy implementation in achieving quality of education based national standard at senior high school. The general objective of this research is to describe and evaluate the implementation of free schooling education Policy in achieving quality of education based on national standard. This research used a descriptive and qualitative method which tried to analyze the real phenomenon without any interventions from the researcher; after the data of research has been collected the data is inspected and analyzed. The result of this research shows that the first, the implementation of free schooling policy could not be hoped to serve good education based national education standard. It can be seen from head master stated that 20 % till 35% budget lost because of this policy. Secondly, the policy of free schooling effectively in increasing total of people go to school because 40% till 50% student of High school increased in total each school. The third, the free schooling policy had given bad effect to the parents' motivation in spending money to invest for their children education. Decreasing of parents' care to their children education achieved till 30%. It shows that free schooling made parents to give education duty to government totally.
Abstrak
Secara politik, janji kebijakan sekolah gratis untuk masyarakat memang menggiurkan, namun dalam pelaksanaannya menimbulkan berbagai masalah. Sekolah gratis di lapangan banyak tidak seperti yang dijanjikan dan perlu ditemukan kondisi sesungguhnya. Penelitian ini menginvestigasi dan mengevaluasi implementasi kebijakan sekolah gratis dalam upaya mencapai Standar Nasional Pendidikan. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode deskriptif evaluatif untuk mengungkap fenomena implementasi kebijakan sekolah gratis tanpa intervensi peneliti. Setelah data dianalisis, hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa: pertama, penerapan kebijakan sekolah gratis tidak dapat diharapkan dalam upaya sekolah menjadi berkualitas berdasarkan Standar Nasional Pendidikan (SNP). Hal ini terlihat dari hasil wawancara dan angket yang menunjukkan 20 % hingga 35% anggaran biaya operasional sekolah tidak terpenuhi. Kedua, kebijakan sekolah gratis terbukti efektif dalam meningkatkan kuantitas siswa sekolah, data menunjukkan 49.28% siswa bertambah pasca penerapan kebijakan ini. Ketiga, motivasi siswa dan orang tua untuk mendukung peningkatan kualitas pendidikan menjadi rendah, hanya 30% orang tua menunjukkan motivasi investasi dalam pendidikan, selebihnya terpapar dampak gratis bermental serba gratis dan menjadi peminta.
References
Achinewhu-Nworgu, E. (2017). Comparing Student Retention in a Public and a Private College: Implications for Tackling Inequality in Education. In Bulgarian Compara-tive Education Society. Bulgarian Comparative Education Society.
Amartya, S. (2010). Nuevo Examen de la Desigualdad. Alianza Editorial, 53–67.
Anonim. (2002). Manajemen Peningkatan Mutu Berbasis Sekolah: Buku 2 Rencana dan Program Pelaksanaan. Direktorat SLP Dirjen Dikdamen Depdiknas.
Ary, L., & Jakob. (1982). Metodologi Penelitian: Snowball Sampling. Bumi Aksara.
Belentsov, S. I., Fahrutdinova, A. V., Grevtseva, G. Y., & Batrachenko, E. A. (2019). Free Education: Fundamentals of Humanistic Pedagogics (On the Example of Activity of the German Public Figures of the Second Half of XIX–The Beginning of the XX Centuries of F. Gansberg, L. Gurlitt, G. Sharrelman. European Journal of Contempo-rary Education, 8(1), 201–207.
Cheruvalath, R. (2015). Is the right of children to free and compulsory education act really beneficial to the poorer children in India? An analysis with special refer-ence to the admission of poorer children in public unaided schools. Education, 43(6), 621–629.
Depdiknas. (2001). Manajemen Peningkatan Mutu Berbasis Sekolah (Edisi 3). Dirjen Dikdasmen.
Depdiknas. (2006). Panduan Manjemen Pembiayaan. Dirjen Dikdasmen'.
Earle, A., Milovantseva, N., & Heymann, J. (2018). Is free pre-primary education associ-ated with increased primary school completion? A global study. ICEP, 12, 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40723-018-0054-1
Karyana, A. (2011). Sekolah Gratis di Sumatera Selatan. Metropolis.
Kuenning, A., & Vieira. (2015). Free Education in University. E Journal of Education Poli-cy, ue.
Kusuda, C. (2016). The struggles of Finacial aid For Higher Education in Brazil. E Jour-nal of Education Policy.
Meier, D. (2003). The Accelerated Learning Handbook: Panduan Kreatif dan Efektif Merancang Kebijakan Pendidikan dan Pelatihan'. Kaifa PT. Mizan Pustaka.
Melo Costa, D. (2013). Public funding and the beginning of a new era in higher educa-tion in Brazil. Journal of Comparative & International Higher Education, 5(Fall), 80–85.
Mondal, A. (2017). Free and Compulsory Primary Education in India Under the British Raj: A Tale of an Unfulfilled Dream. SAGE Open. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244017727037
Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 19 Tahun 2005 tentang Standar Nasional Pendidikan. (2005). Visimedi.
Selatan, G. S. (2009). Pergub: Pedoman penyelenggaraan program Sekolah Gratis di pro-pinsi Sumatera Selatan. Setda Propinsi Sumsel.
Suchman, E. A. (1973). Evaluation Research: Principles and Practice in Public and social Action. Russel Sage Foundation.
Sukmadinata, N. S. (2009). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. PT. Remaja Rosda Karya.
Tilaar, R. A. H. (2006). Standarisasi Pendidikan Nasional, (Suatu Tinjauwan Kritis. Rineka Cipta.
Walton, G. W. (2019). Fee-free education, decentralisation and the politics of scale in Papua New Guinea. Journal of Education Policy, 34(2), 174–194.
Wisudo. (2010). Konsep Pembiayaan Pendidikan. Internet.
Zylmen. (2001). Effective School Management. USA.
