Self-innovation guru dalam meningkatkan prestasi siswa pada masa pandemi COVID-19
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32832/tadibuna.v10i1.4075Keywords:
guru, pembelajaran jarak jauh, pandemi COVID-19, self-innovation, siswaAbstract
The distance learning process during the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in many symptoms experienced by both teachers and students. This becomes the basis for research. The purpose of this study was to explore information related to the practices of teachers in the distance learning process to improve student achievement during the COVID-19 pandemic. The method used in this research is qualitative with a case study approach. The research was conducted in Yogyakarta. Participants in this study were teachers and students. The data collection technique in this study used structured interviews and participatory observation. Research procedures using the Creswell case study model. Data analysis was performed using Atlas.ti software version 8.3. The results of this study provide information that teachers need to improve skills and competencies through self-innovation. The teacher as a center of learning has a direct influence and contribution to student development while studying at home. Students will be able to understand the material well, can always be enthusiastic about learning, and finally, be able to improve achievement even though learning is done remotely during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Abstrak
Proses pembelajaran jarak jauh di masa pandemi COVID-19 mengakibatkan banyak gejala-gejala yang dialami baik oleh guru maupun siswa. Hal ini menjadi dasar dalam penelitian. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk menggali informasi terkait praktik-praktik yang dilakukan oleh guru dalam proses pembelajaran jarak jauh untuk meningkatkan prestasi siswa pada masa pandemi COVID-19. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah kualitatif dengan pendekatan studi kasus. Penelitian dilakukan di Yogyakarta. Partisipan dalam penelitian ini adalah tiga orang guru yang mengajar di Sekolah Dasar Muhammadiyah, Yogyakarta. Teknik pengambilan data dalam penelitian ini menggunakan wawancara terstruktur dan observasi partisipatif. Prosedur penelitian dengan menggunakan model studi kasus Creswell. Analisis data dilakukan dengan menggunakan Software Atlas.ti versi 8.3. Hasil penelitian ini memberikan informasi bahwa guru perlu meningkatkan keterampilan dan kompetensi melalui self-innovation. Guru sebagai center of learning memiliki pengaruh dan andil secara langsung terhadap perkembangan siswa selama belajar di rumah. Siswa akan mampu memahami materi dengan baik, juga dapat selalu semangat dalam belajar, dan akhirnya mampu untuk dapat meningkatkan prestasi walau pembelajaran dilakukan secara jarak jauh selama pandemi COVID-19.
References
Agnew, C. (2001). Editorial Evaluating Changes in Learning and Teaching. Journal of Geography in Hiher Education, 25(3), 293–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309826012008437
Alnajjar, M. (2019). Educational Initiatives in Teacher Education Reform : Curriculum Intervention Educational Initiatives in Teacher Education Reform : Curriculum Intervention and Curriculum Innovation. Journal of Teaching and Teacher Education, 1(2), 103–115. https://doi.org/10.12785/jtte/010204
Barakabitze, A. A. (2015). The Context of Education Initiatives , Importance and Inhibitors of ICTs towards improving teaching and learning in Tanzania : A Critical Literature review The Context of Education Initiatives , Importance and Inhibitors of ICTs towards improving teaching. Information and Knowledge Management, 4(10), 83–97.
Blackall, G. F., Wolpaw, T., & Shapiro, D. (2019). The Exceptional Teacher Initiative: Finding a Silver Lining in Addressing Medical Student Mistreatment (Vol. 94). https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000002700
Chang, T., Hong, G., Paganelli, C., Phantumvanit, P., Chang, W., Shieh, Y., & Hsu, M. (2020). ScienceDirect Innovation of dental education during COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Dental Sciences, 19(August), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2020.07.011
Coughlan, M. (2016). Interviewing in qualitative research: the one-to-one interview. Research Methodology Series, 16(6), 309–314. https://doi.org/10.12968/ijtr.2009.16.6.42433
Creswell, J. W. (2007). Second Edition Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design. Choosing Among Five Apporaches. SAGE Publications Asia-Pacific Pte. Ltd.
Herdiana, D. (2020). Inovasi pembelajaran daring bagi mahasiswa kelas karyawan di masa pandemi COVID-19. Konferensi Nasional Pendidikan I, 1(June), 129–137.
Jones, S., Gopalakrishnan, S., Ameh, C. A., Faragher, B., Sam, B., Labicane, R. R., ... Broek, N. Van Den. (2018). Student evaluation of the impact of changes in teaching style on their learning: a mixed method longitudinal study. BMC Nursing, 17(24), 1–10.
Kanokorn, S., Pongtorn, P., & Sujanya, S. (2014). Soft Skills Development to Enhance Teachers ' Competencies in Primary Schools. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 112(Iceepsy 2013), 842–846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1240
Kawulich, B. (2015). Collecting data through observation. In M. G. C. Wagner, B. Kawulich (Ed.), Doing Social Research: A Global Context (pp. 150–160). New York: McGraw HIll.
Lindfors, E., & Hilmola, A. (2016). Innovation learning in comprehensive education? International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 26(3), 373–389. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-015-9311-6
Mansyur, U. (2016). Inovasi pembelajaran bahasa indonesia melalui pendekatan proses. Jurnal Retorika, 9(2), 90–163.
Mascarenhas, P. R. S. (2005). Skill development for teachers in educational institutions - a review. Tactful Management Research Journal, 11(5), 167–176.
Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia. Surat edaran nomor 4 tahun 2020 tentang pelaksanaan kebijakan pendidikan dalam masa darurat penyebaran corona virus disease (COVID-19) (2020). Jakarta.
Mousavi, S., Nili, M., Nasr, A., & Jr, M. M. (2017). Determination of Innovation Indicators in Teaching-Learning Activities of Curricula and Their Application in Art University. Review of European Studies, 9(4), 136–145. https://doi.org/10.5539/res.v9n4p8
Prasetya, M. A. (2015). E-learning sebagai sebuah inovasi metode active learning. Edukasia: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Islam, 10(2), 319–338.
Russell, C., & Lee, A. (2013). The innovative teaching and educational technology (ITET) fellowship: cultivating communities of practice in learning and teaching. Educational Development and Technology Centre, 2(3), 1–22.
Schilling, K., & Applegate, R. (2012). Best methods for evaluating educational impact : a comparison of the efficacy of commonly used measures of library instruction. Journal Med LIb Assoc, 100(4), 258–269.
Suciati. (2020). Peningkatan kreatifitas dan inisiatif guru melalui model pembelajaran daring pada masa pandemi COVID-19. Ideguru: Jurnal Karya Ilmiah Guru, 5(1), 79–85.
Suri, H. (2018). Purposeful sampling in qualitative research synthesis. Qualitative Research Journal, 11(2), 63–75. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ1102063
Susanty, S. (2020). Inovasi pembelajaran daring dalam merdeka belajar. Hospitality, 9(2), 1–10.
Syakdiyah, A., Mahmudah, N. F., & Wiwik, W. (2019). Active Learner Strategies in Era of Disruption : a Literature Review. International Conference on Progressive Civil Society, 317(1), 165–168.
Thurlings, M., Evers, A. T., & Vermeulen, M. (2015). Toward a model of explaining teachers' innovative behavior: a literature review. Review of Educational Research, XX(X), 1–42. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654314557949
UNESCO. (2020). Education in a post-COVID world: nine ideas for public action. International Commission on the Futures of Education. France.
Wahana Visi Indonesia. (2020). Pandemi COVID-19 dan pengaruhnya terhadap anak Indonesia: sebuah penilaian cepat untuk inisiasi pemulihan awal.
Woolliscroft, J. O. (2020). Innovation in response to the COVID-19 pandemic crisis. Association of American Medical Colleges, 95(8), 1140–1142. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000003402
Zulhafizh, & Permatasari, S. (2020). Developing quality of learning in the pandemic COVID-19 through creative and critical thinking attitudes. Jurnal PAJAR (Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran), 4(5), 937–949. https://doi.org/10.33578/pjr.v4i5.8080
