URGENSI KEBIJAKAN KUHP (KITAB UNDANG-UNDANG HUKUM PIDANA)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32832/yustisi.v11i3.17889Abstract
Urgensi Kebijakan KUHP sangat penting karena berperan dalam menjaga ketertiban dan keadilan di masyarakat Indonesia. Sejak diberlakukan pada tahun 1918, KUHP telah menjadi dasar utama penegakan hukum pidana. Beberapa revisi telah dilakukan untuk menyesuaikan dengan perkembangan zaman dan kebutuhan keadilan yang kompleks. Sebagai landasan hukum yang mengatur tindak pidana dan hukumannya, KUHP memiliki peran vital dalam memelihara ketertiban dan menegakkan keadilan. Oleh karena itu, kebijakan hukum pidana dalam KUHP memiliki urgensi yang tak dapat diabaikan, mengingat dampaknya yang sangat mendalam dalam menjaga kedamaian dan keadilan bagi seluruh warga negara Indonesia.
Kata kunci: Ketertiban, Keadilan, Revisi KUHP
References
Balla, H., & Saputra, I. R. (2024). Urgensi Criminal Liability dalam Rangka Pembaharuan Punishment System Criminal of Law. Jurnal Litigasi Amsir, 11(3), 274–281. http://journalstih.amsir.ac.id/index.php/julia/article/view/431
Burens, L. (2016). Universal Jurisdiction Meets Complementarity: An Approach towards a Desirable Future Codification of Horizontal Complementarity between the Member States of the International Criminal Court. Criminal Law Forum, 27(1), 75–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10609-016-9272-9
Coffey, G. (2013). Resolving Conflicts of Jurisdiction in Criminal Proceedings: Interpreting Ne Bis in Idem in Conjunction with the Principle of Complementarity. New Journal of European Criminal Law, 4(1–2), 59–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/203228441300400105
Garrod, M. (2012). The protective principle of jurisdiction over war crimes and the hollow concept of universality. International Criminal Law Review, 12(5), 763–826. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718123-01205003
Hartin, N. S. (2019). Urgensi Pidana Tutupan: Harapan dan Tantangan. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum De’Jure: Kajian Ilmiah Hukum, 4(September).
Jonaedi Efendi. (2018). Metode Penelitian Hukum: Normatif dan Empiris. https://books.google.co.id/books?hl=en&lr=&id=5OZeDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR5&dq=Metode+penelitian+yuridis+normatif&ots=6896j8w6r_&sig=0cH2KRD3frvSphHhq0jPWedpTGQ&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=Metode%20penelitian%20yuridis%20normatif&f=false
Kaleck, W., & Kroker, P. (2018). Syrian torture investigations in Germany and beyond: Breathing new life into universal jurisdiction in Europe? Journal of International Criminal Justice, 16(1), 165–191. https://doi.org/10.1093/JICJ/MQY014
Lafontaine, F. (2012). Universal jurisdiction-the Realistic Utopia. Journal of International Criminal Justice, 10(5), 1277–1302. https://doi.org/10.1093/JICJ/MQS066
Langer, M. (2013). Universal jurisdiction as Janus-Faced: The dual nature of the German international criminal code. Journal of International Criminal Justice, 11(4), 737–762. https://doi.org/10.1093/JICJ/MQT057
Langer, M. (2015). Universal Jurisdiction is Not Disappearing: The Shift from’Global Enforcer’ to “No Safe Haven” Universal Jurisdiction. Journal of International Criminal Justice, 13(2), 245–256. https://doi.org/10.1093/JICJ/MQV009
Langer, M., & Eason, M. (2019). The quiet expansion of universal jurisdiction. European Journal of International Law, 30(3), 779–817. https://doi.org/10.1093/EJIL/CHZ050
Lubis, F., & Nasution, M. I. (2024). The Implementation of Advocate Immunity Rights in the Criminal Offense of Obstruction f Justice. Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental, 18(8), e06679. https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v18n8-103
Maillart, J. B. (2019). The limits of subjective territorial jurisdiction in the context of cybercrime. ERA Forum, 19(3), 375–390. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12027-018-0527-2
Malau, P. (2023). Tinjauan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) Baru 2023. AL-MANHAJ: Jurnal Hukum Dan Pranata Sosial Islam, 5(1), 837–844. https://doi.org/10.37680/ALMANHAJ.V5I1.2815
Purwati, A. (2020). Metode Penelitian Hukum Teori & Praktek. Jakad Media Publishing.
Sabrina, G., & Musyarri, F. A. (2023). URGENSI PENERAPAN PIDANA PENGAWASAN DALAM UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 1 TAHUN 2023 TENTANG KUHP. Jurnal Yudisial, 16(1), 65–82. https://doi.org/10.29123/JY.V16I1.586
