Adaptive Tropical Waterschappen Model for Sustainable Wetland Governance in Indonesia

Authors

  • Denny Setiawan University Of Lambung Mangkurat
  • Mieske Claudia Lambung Mangkurat University, Indonesia
  • Ahmad Yunani Lambung Mangkurat University, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32832/jm-uika.v17i2.23488

Keywords:

wetland governance; tropical waterschappen; human capital; institutional behavior; adaptive governance

Abstract

Wetlands in Indonesia play a strategic role in food security, water regulation, carbon storage, and local livelihoods, yet their governance remains constrained by fragmented institutions, weak infrastructure maintenance, limited participation, and ecological degradation. This article aims to develop an adaptive governance model for sustainable wetland governance in Indonesia by translating selected principles of the Dutch Waterschappen system into tropical wetland settings. The study applies a qualitative descriptive-comparative conceptual design based on literature review, policy review, and illustrative analysis of five Indonesian wetland contexts. The findings identify four recurring governance problems: hydrological–administrative misalignment, weak institutional continuity, limited participatory integration, and low implementation capacity. In response, the article proposes the Tropical Waterschappen model, consisting of six pillars: hydrology-based institutional alignment, inclusive multi-stakeholder governance, collaborative and sustainable financing, adaptive spatial and ecological management, transparent information and participatory monitoring, and implementation capacity through human capital and institutional behavior. The model contributes to wetland governance literature by linking institutional design with an implementation mechanism grounded in human capital and behavioral readiness. Practically, it offers a management-oriented framework for strengthening coordination, participation, financing continuity, and adaptive ecological governance in Indonesian wetlands.

Author Biography

Mieske Claudia, Lambung Mangkurat University, Indonesia

 

 

References

Adeyemi, A. E., Ahn, J., Xu, Z., Muko, H., & Matt, B. (2025). Promoting SDGs Through Education: A Theory of Planned Behavior Analysis of Japanese and Nigerian Students’ Sustainability Actions. Sustainable Development, 33, 6901–6916. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.3493

Ajzen, I. (1991). The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

Ajzen, I. (2020). The Theory of Planned Behavior: Frequently Asked Questions. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2(4), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.195

Cantaluppi, M. G., Marchi, M. De, Pace, M., & Tosi, M. C. (2023). Wetland Contracts as Sustainable Governance Tools: A Review of the Output of the Interreg Project CREW “Coordinated Wetland Management in Italy-Croatia Cross Border Region.” Sustainability, 15(6491), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086491

Kabat, P., Fresco, L. O., Stive, M. J. F., Veerman, C. P., Alphen, J. S. L. J. Van, Parmet, B. W. A. H., Hazeleger, W., & Katsman, C. A. (2009). Dutch coasts in transition. Nature Publishing Group, 2(7), 450–452. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo572

Lyastini, R., Arman, S., & Sudrajat, J. (2024). Kearifan Lokal Masyarakat Adat Sebaju dalam Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Hutan. Jurnal Teknologi Lahan Basah, 12(3), 749–763. https://doi.org/10.26418/jtllb.v12i3

Novak, A., & Juvan, L. (2025). What Affects Farmers’ Intention to Learn About Sustainability in Online Settings? An Application of the Extended Theory of Planned Behaviour in Slovenia ˇ. Jurnal of Rural Studies, 114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2024.103548

Pahl-Wostl, C. (2009). A Conceptual Framework for Analysing Adaptive Capacity and Multi-level Learning Processes in Resource Governance Regimes. Global Environmental Change, 19(3), 354–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.06.001

Parker, Q. M., Tsimijaly, H., Long, S., & Jones, P. J. S. (2024). A longitudinal Governance Analysis of A locally Managed Marine Area: Ankobohobo Wetland Small-scale Mud Crab Fishery, Madagascar. Marine Policy, 163(April). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2024.106138

Qodriyatun, S. N. (2017). Kesiapan Pemerintah Daerah Provinsi Riau dan Sumatera Selatan dalam Pelaksanaan Kebijakan Restorasi Gambut. Jurnal Aspirasi: Jurnal Masalah Masalah Sosial, Vol 8, No 2 (2017), 113–132. https://doi.org/10.46807/aspirasi.v8i2.1260

Ramsar Convention Secretariat. (2021). Global Wetland Outlook: Special Edition 2021. Ramsar Convention Secretariat. https://www.ramsar.org/document/global-wetland-outlook-special-edition-2021

Runhaar, H., Driessen, P., & others. (2015). Implementation Challenges in Water Policy Integration. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 17(5), 647–663. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2014.919500

Rusadi, S., & Yuslaini, N. (2021). Prinsip Good Environmental Governance oleh Pemerintah Kabupaten Siak ( Studi Kasus Kebakaran Lahan Gambut Di Kecamatan Dayun ). Jurnal Niara, 14(2), 135–141. https://doi.org/10.31849/niara.v14i2.5502

Susilawati, A., Wahyudi, E., Minsyah, N., Selatan, K., Lima, P., & Baru, K. (2017). Pengembangan Teknologi untuk Pengelolaan Lahan Rawa Pasang Surut Berkelanjutan. Jurnal Lahan Suboptimal: Journal of Suboptimal Lands, 6(1), 87–94. https://doi.org/10.33230/JLSO.6.1.2017.295

Yusran, A. (2022). Fragmentasi Kelembagaan dalam Pengelolaan Ekoregion Lahan Basah. Borneo Governance Review, 4(1). https://ojs.ulm.ac.id/index.php/BGR/article/view/11832

Downloads

Published

05-06-2026

How to Cite

Setiawan, D., Claudia, M., & Yunani, A. (2026). Adaptive Tropical Waterschappen Model for Sustainable Wetland Governance in Indonesia. Jurnal Manajemen, 17(2), 500–511. https://doi.org/10.32832/jm-uika.v17i2.23488